Dec 10, 2024
Understanding and Implementing the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) with WhyLabs
- AI risk management
- AI Observability
- AI security
- NIST RMF implementation
- AI compliance
- AI risk mitigation
Dec 10, 2024
TL;DR
- The NIST AI RMF provides a comprehensive framework to identify, measure, and manage AI risks throughout the lifecycle of AI systems, ensuring responsible and trustworthy AI operations.
- Ignoring AI risk management can lead to serious consequences, such as biased outputs, model degradation, security breaches, and regulatory non-compliance, potentially damaging an organization’s reputation and operations.
- Following the NIST AI RMF helps organizations align with governance principles, comply with industry regulations, and mitigate evolving risks like data drift, algorithmic bias, and security vulnerabilities.
- Effective implementation requires continuous monitoring and proactive management across all AI processes, from development to deployment and maintenance, following the core functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.
- Operationalizing the NIST RMF with monitoring tools allows teams to detect anomalies, track performance metrics, and implement guardrails. Platforms like WhyLabs provide the infrastructure to achieve these outcomes efficiently, helping organizations stay ahead of risks and ensure sustainable AI governance.
Introduction
Let’s be honest—managing any technological risk is no easy task. In modern organizations, it is both complex and essential. Whether you’re leading a startup or overseeing operations at a global enterprise, identifying and mitigating potential risks is crucial to ensuring smooth and secure operations.
However, because progress in artificial intelligence (AI) is moving so quickly, old ways of managing risks are no longer enough. AI systems bring unique challenges, including data biases, model drift, and new security vulnerabilities.
AI tools are transforming industries—from healthcare to finance—but they also introduce risks that are difficult to predict and control. As these systems become more deeply embedded in business processes, managing AI risks effectively has become a top priority for many organizations to avoid costly errors, regulatory breaches, and unintended consequences.
Fortunately, organizations don’t need to start from scratch. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has long provided trusted frameworks for managing various risks, and its latest initiative—the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF)—is designed to help organizations address AI's unique challenges. The framework offers practical guidance for identifying, assessing, and mitigating AI-related risks throughout an AI system's lifecycle.
In this article, we’ll explore:
- What the NIST AI RMF is and its role in governing, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks
- The challenges organizations face with securing AI models
- How WhyLabs’ AI Control Center platform aligns with NIST RMF to provide proactive monitoring and risk management solutions
- Practical strategies for implementing the NIST AI RMF with WhyLabs
- After reading this article, you will know why ensuring your AI strategy fits with the NIST framework is important and how WhyLabs can help you do that.
Understanding the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF)
Organizations using AI need to understand and mitigate risks such as data drift, model bias, and security vulnerabilities to ensure compliance, maintain trust, and safeguard against unintended consequences.
This section will guide you through the importance, objectives, principles, and risks the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) addresses. The framework offers a structured, flexible approach to managing these risks and promoting trustworthy AI.
What is the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF)?
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) is a voluntary but robust guideline developed to assist organizations in identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks associated with AI systems. AI introduces risks beyond traditional IT systems, including algorithmic bias, data drift, security vulnerabilities, and trustworthiness issues.
The NIST AI RMF aims to bridge these gaps by providing a structured way to manage risks across the AI lifecycle—from design and development to deployment and monitoring.
NIST developed this framework through an extensive, consensus-driven process involving feedback from over 200 organizations worldwide. In January 2023, NIST released the AI RMF 1.0 and the corresponding playbook. The playbook encourages organizations to align their AI risk management efforts with best practices that promote transparency, fairness, and security.
The NIST AI RMF is structured into two parts:
- Foundational information: Context, definitions, audience, principles, and effectiveness for managing AI risk.
- Core functions and profiles: Practical steps for organizations to govern, map, measure, and manage AI risks effectively.
Foundational information of the NIST AI RMF
The NIST AI RMF begins by framing risk as a balance between opportunities and potential negative impacts. Risk in AI systems involves understanding the likelihood of an event (vulnerability) and its consequences, which can affect individuals, organizations, or even interconnected systems and the environment.
NIST emphasizes that organizations must adopt proactive risk management strategies without aiming to eliminate all risks but instead prioritize high-impact risks—trading some risks for positive outcomes is often essential.
What does trading risks for positive outcomes mean? It refers to organizations tolerating certain manageable risks to achieve greater benefits. For instance, deploying an AI model for disease diagnosis might involve risks like data drift or interpretability issues. However, the potential positive outcomes—such as earlier disease detection, improved treatment accuracy, and lives saved—may justify those risks, provided they are monitored and mitigated effectively.
AI risks are categorized into three key areas:
- Human and societal harm: Risks affecting individuals' rights, safety, or economic opportunities.
- Organizational harm: Impacts on an organization’s operations, security, finances, or reputation.
- Interdependent systems and environmental harm: Risks affecting other systems, global networks, or the planet.
NIST AI RMF recognizes that measuring and managing AI risks is challenging due to their evolving nature. It encourages organizations to align their AI activities with legal requirements, such as the EU AI Act, and integrate AI risk management with other frameworks like cybersecurity and privacy strategies.
The framework also promotes continuous testing and risk prioritization to focus on what matters most, ensuring business value is maintained while minimizing potential harm.
Core functions and profiles of the NIST AI RMF
The core of the NIST AI RMF consists of four key interrelated functions—Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage—that guide organizations in identifying, assessing, and mitigating AI risks. These functions ensure continuous alignment between AI activities, risk management strategies, and business objectives.
Each function includes specific categories and subcategories that organizations can adapt to their unique needs for maintaining trustworthy and responsible AI systems. They are designed to work iteratively and are not strictly sequential, though most experts and practitioners recommend starting with the Govern function.
In this section, you will learn about each section, including the key aspects that apply to you. You’ll also see how WhyLabs helps implement each core function to make aligning AI systems with the NIST AI RMF easier.
Govern function
The Govern function establishes policies, processes, and procedures to ensure that AI activities align with the organization’s risk appetite, regulatory requirements (e.g., EU AI Act), and business objectives. This function is essential for creating a risk management culture across the organization. Key aspects include:
- Accountability: Defining roles and responsibilities and assigning decision-making authority to senior leadership.
- Diversity and inclusion: Involving diverse teams to promote ethical design and avoid biased outcomes.
- Communication: Establishing clear communication channels for reporting, feedback, and continuous risk monitoring.
- Oversight of third-party AI resources: Monitoring and managing the risks associated with external vendors (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic) or pre-trained models (e.g., Llama 3).
Senior leadership is key in setting the tone for risk management across your organization and ensuring that AI systems comply with legal and regulatory requirements.
How WhyLabs helps
The WhyLabs AI Control Center supports the Govern function by:
- Providing transparent monitoring and customizable reporting tools that align with organizational policies and risk mitigation efforts with regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act, MITRE ATLAS™, and OWASP Top 10 standards for LLMs
- Enabling role-based dashboards that give relevant stakeholders—from data scientists to compliance officers—clear, real-time visibility into AI operations and risk indicators.
- Auditing and traceability features, ensuring that the AI system's behavior and operations are continuously aligned with governance standards, including automatic logging of critical events and interventions.
Map function
The Map function identifies AI risks and aligns them with the organization’s goals, regulatory requirements, and societal impact. Mapping ensures that all phases of the AI lifecycle—design, development, deployment—are aligned with risk management efforts. Key activities include:
- Context setting: Defining the AI system's purpose, scope, and potential impacts.
- Categorizing risks: Identifying specific risks (e.g., data bias, hateful content, information security, and information integrity) across AI components.
- Engagement with stakeholders: Gathering feedback from internal and external teams to reduce negative impacts proactively.
Mapping AI risks provides visibility across the lifecycle and helps organizations identify critical risks before deploying AI systems.
How WhyLabs helps
- WhyLabs Observe helps organizations map AI-related risks by:
- Tracking feature, concept, and data drift in real-time, giving teams visibility into emerging risks before they impact the AI system.
- Enabling feedback loops with customizable alerts for unexpected behaviors, helping organizations detect risks dynamically.
- Providing root-cause analysis tools that help correlate performance issues with external factors, giving organizations a comprehensive view of risks across their AI systems.
- Offering visualization tools in WhyLabs helps data scientists and engineers connect AI performance metrics to business outcomes, enhancing their ability to make informed go/no-go decisions at each stage.
SynthID: A tool for watermarking and identifying AI-generated content
Measure function
The Measure function involves evaluating the effectiveness of AI models through quantitative and qualitative metrics or mixed methods. This function ensures that the system’s performance, fairness, security, and privacy align with the organization’s risk tolerance. Measurement informs improvements through continuous tracking of key indicators. Activities include:
- TEVV (Test, Evaluation, Verification, and Validation) metrics: Embedded throughout the AI lifecycle to evaluate the model performance to ensure reliability and alignment with business outcomes.
- Transparency metrics: Monitoring AI decision-making for risks such as fairness, bias, and security vulnerabilities and ensuring models meet regulatory standards.
- Feedback loops: Integrating feedback mechanisms to monitor risks after deployment.
Organizations can proactively address emerging threats and adjust AI systems to maintain performance and compliance by continuously measuring risk factors. The outputs from the Measure function play a critical role in guiding the next function—Manage.
How WhyLabs helps
- LangKit, an open-source text metrics tool maintained by WhyLabs, complements the NIST AI RMF’s Measure function by enabling organizations to measure and analyze key metrics from LLMs. LangKit extracts telemetry data—such as toxicity, hallucinations, malicious prompts, and topic relevance—from prompts and responses, ensuring that the model’s behavior aligns with policies and business goals. With LangKit, organizations can:
- Validate and safeguard prompts and responses by tracking whether LLM behavior complies with predefined standards.
- Detect trends and surface anomalies across different prompt versions, supporting A/B testing for improved prompt engineering.
- Reduce risks in production environments by identifying violations like jailbreak attempts or toxic responses in real-time.
- LangKit integrates seamlessly with the WhyLabs AI Control Center, which receives telemetry data from LangKit to provide continuous monitoring. WhyLabs establishes thresholds and guardrails to detect anomalies and ensure the ongoing performance of LLMs. This integration allows teams to manage their AI systems proactively by:
- Tracking model behavior over time using custom dashboards.
- Receiving alerts and notifications when anomalies or unexpected trends arise.
- Collaborating across teams by sharing telemetry insights through WhyLabs' platform.
Manage function
The Manage function allocates resources and develops plans to effectively prioritize and mitigate AI risks. Organizations implement controls to ensure the AI system continues to align with intended goals while balancing risks and benefits. It involves:
- Prioritization of risks: Focus on high-impact and high-likelihood risks.
- Risk treatment: Modify system behavior or deploy insurance for risk transfer (e.g., maintaining override mechanisms to deactivate systems if necessary).
- Third-party monitoring: Managing risks associated with external AI resources or models.
- Ongoing monitoring: Ensuring systems remain within acceptable performance boundaries post-deployment.
- Keeping records: Documenting incident response, recovery, and continuous improvement plans.
The Manage function ensures that your organization’s risk management is not just reactive but also proactive. This way, organizations can maximize the benefits of AI systems while minimizing negative impacts.
Here’s a Comparison Table of Risk Prioritization Strategies that align with the Manage function of the NIST AI RMF:
The table breaks down risk prioritization strategies, helping organizations efficiently allocate resources by focusing on the highest-priority risks while monitoring others for potential escalation.
How WhyLabs helps
- The WhyLabs AI Control Center offers guardrails for real-time threat prevention. This enables teams to respond instantly to security threats and adjust guardrails dynamically to prevent misuse, data breaches, or model failures. The Center extends the capabilities of the Manage function in the following ways:
- Providing real-time guardrails that detect and mitigate harmful behaviors such as toxic responses, data leakage, hallucinations, and prompt injections.
- Offering custom monitors to detect issues like sensitive data leakage, toxic responses, or malicious prompts, and automate interventions to prevent further risks
- Enabling automated alerts and notifications to streamline responses to known and emerging risks.
Profiles in the NIST AI RMF
Profiles provide tailored risk management strategies based on an organization’s specific context. These profiles help align the core functions with industry regulations, risk tolerance, and operational goals. The three profile types are:
- Use case profiles: Customized risk frameworks for specific industries or applications (e.g., banking vs. entertainment).
- Temporal profiles: Divided into current profiles (representing the existing state) and target profiles (describing desired outcomes), temporal profiles help organizations identify and address gaps. They highlight gaps and help develop action plans for improvement.
- Cross-sectoral profiles: Address risks shared across industries or technologies, providing a unified approach to managing risks for organizations using multiple AI systems across sectors.
The AI RMF Playbook operationalizes these functions, offering tactical guidance based on the chosen profile. Organizations can use the playbook to continuously assess and refine their AI risk management strategies, ensuring AI systems remain safe, reliable, and aligned with business goals.
Key risks AI practitioners must manage under NIST RMF
The NIST AI RMF identifies key risks organizations face when developing and operating AI systems, such as the misuse of models, privacy violations, or bias amplification. These risks are prevalent across the AI lifecycle and affect people, societies, organizations, and ecosystems—as we explored earlier in the “Foundational Information of the NIST AI RMF” section.
Both technical and non-technical stakeholders must understand these risks to create and implement structured mitigation to promote the safe and trustworthy use of AI systems.
This section discusses the major risks our customers at WhyLabs face under the AI RMF and those we see in production systems. Here, you will see:
- What these risks look like,
- Their severity,
- Strategies to mitigate them,
- How WhyLabs addresses the risks with observability and security features.
The WhyLabs Control Center offers observability and security guardrails to address several risks using customizable tools and automated detection.
Human and societal harm
These risks impact individuals, groups, or society by compromising safety, privacy, fairness, or spreading misinformation.
1. Dangerous, violent, or hateful content
- Description: The risk of AI generating or facilitating the spread of violent, inciting, or toxic content.
- Severity: High
- Impact: Harm to individuals and societal well-being.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ✅ Full support with customizable safeguards.
- Monitor the sentiment and toxicity AI models with WhyLabs through the open-source LangKit text metrics tool. By default, LangKit calculates the toxicity score using HuggingFace's martin-ha/toxic-comment-model toxicity analyzer. LangKit provides the metrics and logs the results to WhyLabs for you to monitor.
- In addition, WhyLabs through LangKit supports the following toxicity models: detoxify/unbiased, detoxify/multilingual, detoxify/original.
- WhyLabs also uses a DeBERTa-based sentence similarity approach to detect issues and take blocking action. This approach detects the relevance of prompts or responses to curated topics such as harmful, hateful, or violent content. WhyLabs also supports any customer-provided models for detecting toxicity and bias.
2. Confabulation (hallucinations)
- Description: AI systems generating incorrect (misleading, false, or fabricated) but confident outputs, potentially misleading users.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Potential misinformation and deception leading to social or economic harm.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ✅ Full support with consistency-based monitoring.
- WhyLabs provides truthfulness metrics to help you detect hallucinations, errors, and ambiguous responses that can result in overreliance. WhyLabs also supports "LLM-as-a-judge," using the same LLM that is being called by the application to perform consistency checks, especially within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) contexts.
- Examples of such guardrail metrics include:
3. Obscene, degrading, or abusive content
- Description: Production of harmful imagery, including synthetic child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or non-consensual content.
- Severity: Critical.
- Impact: Psychological harm to individuals and erosion of social trust.
- WhyLabs Control Center: Partial support, with image content filtering capabilities planned by Q2 2025 through third-party integrations.
- WhyLabs Secure will support policy rulesets for images as a first-class citizen in Q2 2025. You will be able to configure WhyLabs to integrate with third-party content filters, such as the Azure OpenAI content filtering service.
4. Harmful bias or homogenization
- Description: Biases in AI systems that lead to discrimination or performance disparities across demographic groups.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Negative societal outcomes and exclusion of marginalized communities.
- WhyLabs Control Center: Partial support, with plans to introduce bias policies in Q1 2025.
- Sample metrics for bias detection include accuracy, sentiment, fairness, and more. These metrics can provide feedback on the bias in LLM outputs and help to continuously improve the biases detected in LLMs.
- LangKit currently provides sentiment, text quality, and relevance metrics monitorable in WhyLabs that partially contribute to this. We are evaluating a bias-tuned DistilROBERTA model to enable a dedicated bias ruleset in Q4 2024.
5. Human-AI configuration
- Description: Misaligned human-AI interactions can lead to over-reliance, algorithmic aversion, or emotional entanglement.
- Severity: Medium.
- Impact: Potential psychological or emotional harm to individuals.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ❌ ; This is not currently applicable within WhyLabs Secure, as handling these risks requires additional non-technical interventions such as user education and policy management.
Organizational harm
These risks impact organizations' operations, security, finances, and reputations, exposing them to liability, regulatory challenges, and cyberattacks.
1. Data privacy
- Description: Exposure or misuse of sensitive data, including personal identifiers and biometric data.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Legal non-compliance, fines, and reputational damage.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ✅ Fully mitigated through regex filters and PII detection.
- WhyLabs provides multiple options for enforcing data privacy. The first approach uses LangKit’s regex metric, which is very cost-effective and low-latency.
- Additionally, it integrates with Microsoft Presidio for advanced PII detection, blocking non-compliant data interactions.
2. Information integrity
- Description: Use of AI for misinformation campaigns or the dissemination of unverified information that could affect decision-making.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Reputational damage and erosion of public trust in organizational communications.
- WhyLabs Control: ✅ Full support with SelfCheckGPT techniques.
- You can configure WhyLabs Secure to use any LLM for hallucination detection. The technique requires making multiple calls to the original LLM. The hallucination module from LangKit will compute the consistency between a target response and a group of additional response samples, generating a metric containing a hallucination score.
- The premise is that if the LLM has knowledge of the topic, it should be able to generate similar and consistent responses when asked the same question multiple times.
- For more information on this approach, see SELFCHECKGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models
3. Information security
- Description: Increased vulnerability to cyberattacks and exploitation of the AI system’s weaknesses.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Compromised operations, financial loss, and data breaches.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ✅ Fully supported with jailbreak and prompt injection detection.
- WhyLabs provides prompt injection detection support for both logic and security-violating risk categories. This includes jailbreak detection support (a user interaction strategy that gets the model to bypass desired behavior set by the model developer to violate content policies or safety policies originally set).
- WhyLabs provides attack detection and prevention (using Guardrails API) at all phases of the kill chain to varying degrees of quality and consistency, including prompt mutations (to reduce the chance of LLM memory skewing results).
4. Intellectual property
- Description: Unauthorized use or replication of copyrighted material. trade secrets, or sensitive information.
- Severity: High.
- Impact: Legal exposure, loss of intellectual property, and financial penalties.
- WhyLabs Control Center: Partial support with external integrations is available.
- By default, WhyLabs provides a generic topics classifier that uses the MoritzLaurer/mDeBERTa-v3-base-xnli-multilingual-nli-2mil7 model to classify the input text into default topics such as law, finance, support, etc. It creates a metric that classifies based on similarity to relevant topics and scores.
- You can configure WhyLabs to integrate with third-party content filters such as Azure OpenAI Content Filter for use cases involving copyright infringement, plagiarism, or illegal replication. You can also configure it to detect and protect a customer's provided IP stored in a database or a vector database.
5. Value chain and component integration
- Description: Insecure or non-transparent third-party integrations can lead to system security risks.
- Severity: High
- Impact: Operational risks, decreased accountability, and potential system failures.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ❌ ; Not currently supported, though WhyLabs is evaluating potential approaches to improve transparency following OWASP guidance.
- It is not applicable for a Guardrails security control; it would require separate controls to reduce the chances of insecure actions being performed on systems in the scope of reliance.
- As per OWASP guidance, we evaluate different approaches for performing automated follow-on actions based on LLM output, Guardrails, or otherwise. This is a complex and case-specific process, so how that might be extended generically is unclear.
Interdependent systems (ecosystems) and environmental harm
These risks involve environmental and systemic impacts across multiple domains, influencing ecosystems or the global economy.
1. CBRN information or capabilities
Description: AI systems enabling the spread of dangerous materials or the use of information related to chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) weapons.
- Severity: Critical.
- Impact: Global security risks and potential harm to interconnected systems.
- Mitigation: WhyLabs blocks nefarious prompts and responses through customizable detectors, preventing misuse and malicious intent in AI interactions.
- WhyLabs Control Center: ✅ Full support with customizable safeguards.
- You can configure WhyLabs to take actions, such as blocking prompts or responses that indicate malicious intent from bad actors, such as jailbreaking, injection, and refusal behavior. WhyLabs supports customizable detectors you can create using examples of nefarious prompts/phrases.
2. Environmental impact
- Description: High computing resource utilization for AI model training and operationalization has adverse environmental effects.
- Severity: Moderate.
- Impact: Increased carbon footprint and strain on ecosystems through excessive energy usage.
- WhyLabs Control Center: Partially supported, with plans to minimize unnecessary compute usage through policy rules (e.g., blocking excessive requests).
- WhyLabs Guardrails provides metrics for text statistics that correlate to token-based costs. Example text stats include token count, character count, and word count. Token consumption is correlated to changes in cost, which is indirectly related to compute resource utilization.
- There are two additional environmental-related benefits of using WhyLabs:
- Configuring blocking on certain rulesets will prevent sending prompts that violate the policy to the LLM, reducing overall usage of the LLM API.
- The Guardrail API runs on commodity hardware (except for hallucination detectors, which in certain configurations use an LLM), minimizing compute needs.
Use case in action: enhanced security monitoring
- An example includes deploying WhyLabs' Guardrails to detect and block prompt injections for a financial institution using generative AI chatbots. This safeguards sensitive customer data and aligns with NIST’s Information Security recommendations
Case study: How Yoodli implements the NIST AI RMF with WhyLabs
Yoodli, an AI-powered speech coaching platform, leveraged the WhyLabs AI Control Platform to ensure reliable performance and effective risk management for its LLM-based solution. When they used WhyLabs, Yoodli implemented the NIST AI RMF's core principles of measurement, monitoring, and governance. This safeguarded their LLMs from degrading performance and having unintended effects.
WhyLabs enabled Yoodli to:
- Continuously monitor key metrics like toxicity, sentiment, and response quality to ensure alignment with NIST’s focus on risk detection.
- Experiment with new prompt versions through A/B testing while managing model drift and inconsistency risks, in accordance with NIST’s principles of iteration and measurement.
- Automate anomaly detection and alerts to identify unexpected behaviors and maintain customer trust.
- Integrate guardrails to mitigate misuse and secure LLM applications against malicious prompts and data breaches.
With WhyLabs, Yoodli successfully reduced operational risks, improved feature rollout speed, and ensured consistent AI performance—offering a safety net that embodies the NIST RMF's goals of proactive and continuous risk management.
Conclusion
Managing the complexities of AI risks is essential for ensuring reliable, secure, and responsible AI systems. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) provides a comprehensive approach to identifying, measuring, and mitigating these risks throughout the AI lifecycle. However, successfully implementing the NIST RMF requires continuous monitoring, proactive management, and alignment with governance frameworks.
This is where WhyLabs becomes a valuable partner. With real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, and customizable guardrails, WhyLabs equips organizations to effectively meet the challenges of AI risk management. By integrating WhyLabs’ platform into their workflows, businesses gain the visibility, accountability, and agility necessary to implement the NIST RMF at scale.
Organizations like Yoodli have already demonstrated the value of WhyLabs, using the platform to monitor LLMs and reduce AI risks such as bias, drift, and unexpected behavior. With WhyLabs, companies can ship new features confidently, knowing that their AI systems are safeguarded by quantitative metrics and aligned with best practices in AI risk management.
Frequently asked questions on the NIST AI RMF
1. What is the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) and why is it important for AI governance?
The NIST AI RMF is a structured framework designed to help organizations identify, assess, and manage risks related to AI systems. AI governance is crucial as it ensures that AI models are trustworthy, secure, and compliant with ethical standards, reducing the risk of errors, biases, and compliance issues.
2. How does the NIST AI RMF help organizations manage AI risks?
The NIST AI RMF provides a structured approach for identifying, measuring, and mitigating AI risks throughout AI systems' lifecycle. Its framework focuses on four core functions—Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage—ensuring organizations align their AI operations with governance principles, monitor risks continuously, and implement proactive risk management strategies.
3. How does WhyLabs align with the NIST AI RMF?
WhyLabs aligns with the NIST AI RMF by offering real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, and customizable guardrails. These capabilities help organizations continuously measure risks such as model drift, data inconsistencies, and bias. WhyLabs’ platform also ensures accountability through automated alerts and reporting, empowering teams to manage AI risks proactively and in alignment with NIST’s standards.
4. What are the key benefits of using WhyLabs for AI risk management?
WhyLabs offers end-to-end monitoring, security features, and custom metrics integration through its platform. These features enable businesses to detect and mitigate risks in real-time, maintain regulatory compliance, and enhance AI governance.
Organizations like Yoodli have successfully implemented WhyLabs to safeguard their LLM-based applications. This allows them to iterate faster and improve model performance while ensuring continuous risk management.
Other posts
Best Practicies for Monitoring and Securing RAG Systems in Production
Oct 8, 2024
- Retrival-Augmented Generation (RAG)
- LLM Security
- Generative AI
- ML Monitoring
- LangKit
How to Evaluate and Improve RAG Applications for Safe Production Deployment
Jul 17, 2024
- AI Observability
- LLMs
- LLM Security
- LangKit
- RAG
- Open Source
WhyLabs Integrates with NVIDIA NIM to Deliver GenAI Applications with Security and Control
Jun 2, 2024
- AI Observability
- Generative AI
- Integrations
- LLM Security
- LLMs
- Partnerships
OWASP Top 10 Essential Tips for Securing LLMs: Guide to Improved LLM Safety
May 21, 2024
- LLMs
- LLM Security
- Generative AI
7 Ways to Evaluate and Monitor LLMs
May 13, 2024
- LLMs
- Generative AI
How to Distinguish User Behavior and Data Drift in LLMs
May 7, 2024
- LLMs
- Generative AI
